As of November 21, 2025, India’s labour reform transition period has officially concluded. The four consolidated statutes—the Code on Wages, Code on Social Security, Industrial Relations Code, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code—are now in force, replacing a patchwork of 29 central labour laws.

A surprising number of companies still operate under the belief that their legacy HR manuals— once drafted when fax machines and dot matrix printers were still a thing, continue to hold in today’s fast paced world. The concept of “grandfathered policies” in this context is less a legal principle and more a work of fiction.

Labour Law Compliance in India: Old Models do not work

The reluctance to adapt to changes is the biggest challenge to Companies with onset of AI and Gen-Z employees. For decades, internal policies revolved around the familiar distinction between “workman” and “manager.” The new framework has expanded the definition of “employee,” bringing a much wider segment of the workforce within the scope of statutory protection. Supervisory roles, mid-level employees, and categories that previously existed in a comfortable grey zone are now very much within regulatory reach. In other words, if your organisation has been relying on job titles to avoid compliance obligations, the law has quietly moved on.

The redefinition of wages adds another layer of complexity. With at least 50 percent of total cost-to-company now required to be classified as wages, payroll structures that once optimised cash flow may now invite scrutiny. Provident fund contributions, gratuity calculations, and bonus liabilities are all directly impacted. Appointment letters are mandatory across the board, fixed-term employees qualify for gratuity after just one year, and the threshold for government approval in layoffs and closures now stands at 300 employees. These are not cosmetic changes but they affect balance sheets, workforce strategy, for the less prepared, sleep cycles.

Aligning Central Labour Codes with State-Specific Rules

Both central and state governments have the authority to frame rules. States such as Karnataka, including Bangalore, have already introduced specific regulatory frameworks. Businesses must ensure that their internal policies align not only with central legislation but also with state-level requirements. Failure to harmonise both can result in technical non-compliance despite apparent adherence to central laws.

Fixed-term employment has now been formally recognised, offering companies flexibility that was previously difficult to achieve. Naturally, this flexibility comes with conditions that are often discovered only when it is too late.

Employment Contracts must be drafted with precision and are a one time investment. A poorly structured fixed-term agreement can quickly blur into permanent employment, bringing with it unintended liabilities. At the same time, statutory benefits must be extended on a proportionate basis, whether convenient or not.

---

Managing Cross-Border Labour Law Liability for Multi National Companies

For companies with international structures, the new labour regime introduces an additional layer of complexity: joint liability. In transactions involving mergers, acquisitions, or business transfers, unpaid statutory dues do not simply disappear. They travel—often upward. Parent entities, including those led by NRIs or foreign stakeholders, may find themselves responsible for defaults originating in Indian subsidiaries.

Although the Codes are in force, their full implementation depends on detailed rules notified by both central and state governments. Labour rules provide a clear indication of what lies ahead.

Emerging trends include standardisation of working hours with flexibility up to 12 hours per day (subject to a 48-hour weekly cap), expansion of social security coverage to gig and platform workers, mandatory digital registration of establishments, and increased reliance on electronic compliance systems.

There is also a clear move toward web-based inspections, stricter contractor regulation, and enhanced accountability of principal employers. Documentation, once a routine administrative exercise, is now central to compliance enforcement. The revised framework is not merely advisory. Penalties for non-compliance have increased significantly, with fines ranging from ₹50,000 to ₹1,00,000 for initial violations, and more severe consequences—including imprisonment—for repeat offences.

The reality is straightforward.

If your employment agreements, HR policies, payroll structures, and compliance systems have not been reviewed in light of the new Codes, they are almost certainly misaligned, and are enough to create exposure where it matters most: inspections, disputes and due diligence.

Most organisations pause, not because they disagree, but because reviewing everything feels like a large exercise and so is defending a AI generated employment contract or explaining inconsistent policies to a regulator.